Legal Opinion

Mattingly Lumber Co. v. Equitable Building & Savings Ass'n

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided April 14, 1939No. [No. 25, January Term, 1939.]PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShehan, J.

' The appellants, the Mattingly Lumber Company and the Goddard Millwork and Lumber Company, are both bodies corporate, and assignees of J. Hurst Purnell of the obligation upon which this suit was brought. These companies sued the Equitable Building and Savings Association of Baltimore City to recover the sum of $2000, hypothecated with it by J. Hurst Purnell under an agreement in writing. The right of recovery was denied by the defendant in three demurrer prayers, which were granted, and, from the judgment entered on the verdict for the defendant, this appeal is taken.

J. Hurst Purnell,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Citizens' Fire Insurance, Security & Land Co. v. DollCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1872
  2. Brownstein v. New York Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1930
  3. Phoenix Pad Manufacturing Co. v. RothCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1916
  4. William Danzer & Co. v. Western Maryland Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1933
  5. Lambdin v. DantzebeckerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1935

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Canaras v. Lift Truck Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1974
  2. Evergreen Amusement Corp. v. MilsteadCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1998
  3. Sagner v. Glenangus Farms, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1964
  4. Federal Insurance v. Allstate InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
  5. Credible Behavioral Health v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2019

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API