Legal Opinion

Unicover World Trade Corp. v. Tri-State Mint, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided May 17, 1994No. Nos. 93-8019, 93-8021PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LOGAN, Circuit Judge.

I

This appeal and cross-appeal follow entry of judgment in a contract dispute tried to the court.1 The judgment substantially favored Unieover World Trade Corporation (Unicover). On appeal Tri-State Mint, Inc. (TriState) argues that Unieover committed a material breach of contract that barred its recovery against Tri-State. Unieover argues that the district court erred when it refused to award Unieover attorney’s fees.

Unieover is a direct mail marketer of numismatic and philatelic items. Tri-State custom mints legal tender and commemorative coins. Unieover contracted with…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Salve Regina College v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. UNC Teton Exploration Drilling, Inc. v. PeytonWyoming Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Wilma F. Gundy v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1984
  5. Miles v. CEC Homes, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1988

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Watson Ex Rel. Watson v. BeckelCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
  2. Southern Colorado MRI, Ltd. v. Med-Alliance, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
  3. Deer Crest Associates I, L.L.C. v. Avalon Deer Valley, L.L.C.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
  4. National Commodity and Barter Association National Commodity Exchange v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
  5. Robert Dunn v. Claude Lamph, Medical TechnicianCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API