Legal Opinion
Nayal v. HIP Network Services IPA, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided May 28, 2009No. 08 Civ. 10170PublishedCited by 51 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
VICTOR MARRERO, District Judge. ■
Plaintiff Dr. Christine Nayal (“Nayal”) brought this class action on behalf of herself and all others similarly-situated against defendant HIP Network Services IPA, Inc. (“HIP”), asserting claims of breach of contract, unjust enrichment, and violation of New York General Business Law § 349 (“§ 349”). HIP filed a motion to compel arbitration of Nayal’s claims pursuant to the Federal Arbitration Act (“FAA”), 9 U.S.C. §§ 2-4, or, in the alternative, to dismiss Nayal’s claims pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Gilmer v. Interstate/Johnson Lane Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Doctor's Associates, Inc. v. CasarottoSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Perry v. ThomasSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Gillman v. Chase Manhattan Bank, N. A.New York Court of Appeals · 1988
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- Ragone v. Atlantic Video at the Manhattan CenterCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
- Spinelli v. National Football LeagueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2018
- Begonja v. Vornado Realty TrustDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2016
- Kai Peng v. Uber Technologies, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2017
- Raniere v. Citigroup Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2011
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.