Legal Opinion

Jones v. Smith

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided May 3, 1951No. 33564PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSutton, C.J.

(After stating the foregoing facts.) The petition of the applicant for mandamus and the answer of the respondent, denying material portions of the petition, raise a question of fact as to whether the bill of exceptions was tendered to the clerk on February 26 to be filed immediately by him on that date, or was to be held by him and filed at a later date during the fifteen-day period from its certification by the trial judge, which is allowed by law for the filing thereof. The Constitution of this State provides that the Court of Appeals shall have jurisdiction for the trial and correction of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Brinson v. Georgia Railroad Bank & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1932
  2. Hilt v. YoungSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
  3. Cooper v. NisbetSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  4. Cooper v. NisbetSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  5. Duke v. TrippeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1849

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Marathon Oil Co. v. HollisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
  2. State v. EllisonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2005
  3. DeFee v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
  4. St. Paul-Mercury Indemnity Co. v. Koppers Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1957
  5. Sunn v. Trophy Marine, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1985

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API