Legal Opinion
St. Paul-Mercury Indemnity Co. v. Koppers Co.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided April 25, 1957No. 36542PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtQuillian, J.
In this opinion the plaintiff in error will be referred to as the defendant and the defendant in error as the plaintiff, they having occupied those positions in the trial court.
The defendant insists that the writ of error should be dismissed because the bill of exceptions was not filed with the clerk of the trial court until November 26, 1956, which was seventeen days after the date of certification by the trial judge. This contention would be meritorious were it not for the fact that the clerk of the trial court has filed a certificate in which she states the bill of exceptions was presented…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- American Surety Co. v. Small Quarries Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1923
- McDaniel v. Columbus Fertilizer Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1899
- Stephens v. CrawfordSupreme Court of Georgia · 1846
- Hannah v. Lovelace-Young Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1925
- Southern Surety Co. v. DawesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1925
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Scott v. OxfordCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
- Home Indemnity Co. v. Battey MacHinery Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1964
- Lord v. LoweCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2012
- Campbell v. BentonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1961
- State v. Fidelity and Deposit Company of MarylandSupreme Court of Delaware · 1963
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.