Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Walentoski

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 18, 1982No. 863PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BROSKY, Judge:

This appeal follows appellant’s conviction on charges of theft and conspiracy to commit theft. Mr. Walentoski was tried before a jury in November, 1978. On appeal, he raises many issues, but basically he alleges that his trial counsel rendered him ineffective assistance and that the verdict is not supported by sufficient evidence. For the reasons that follow, we reverse and remand.

Mr. Walentoski is charged with having taken several items from a Sears warehouse with the assistance of a then Sears employee. That employee, a Mr. Myers, testified at the trial and admitted his…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Henry v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Commonwealth v. ClairSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  3. Commonwealth v. HolzerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  4. Commonwealth v. TriplettSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  5. Commonwealth v. DreibelbisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. HanesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. Commonwealth v. ChannellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  3. Commonwealth v. DodgeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  4. Commonwealth v. CotoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  5. Commonwealth v. AtwoodSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API