Commonwealth v. Walentoski
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
BROSKY, Judge:
This appeal follows appellant’s conviction on charges of theft and conspiracy to commit theft. Mr. Walentoski was tried before a jury in November, 1978. On appeal, he raises many issues, but basically he alleges that his trial counsel rendered him ineffective assistance and that the verdict is not supported by sufficient evidence. For the reasons that follow, we reverse and remand.
Mr. Walentoski is charged with having taken several items from a Sears warehouse with the assistance of a then Sears employee. That employee, a Mr. Myers, testified at the trial and admitted his…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Henry v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Commonwealth v. ClairSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Commonwealth v. HolzerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Commonwealth v. TriplettSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Commonwealth v. DreibelbisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Commonwealth v. HanesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Commonwealth v. ChannellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Commonwealth v. DodgeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Commonwealth v. CotoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- Commonwealth v. AtwoodSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.