Legal Opinion

Gurland v. Town of Kearny

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided February 1, 1942PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Perskie, J.

The primary question requiring decision is whether section 6A-10 of respondent’s ordinance imposing a license fee of $300 for each vehicle used in connection with the peddling of ice cream and ice cream combinations is valid. The secondary question is whether prosecutor’s attack is premature.

On September 11th, 1940, respondent, Town of Kearny, passed an ordinance for revenue purposes effective June 1st, 1941, regulating and licensing the business of “peddling” goods, wares and merchandise in its town, fixing the “license fees” therefor, and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Payne v. Borough of Sea BrightSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1936
  2. Levin v. City of Asbury ParkSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1931
  3. Rosencrans v. Township of EatontownSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1910
  4. Siciliano v. Township of NeptuneSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1912
  5. Hoffman v. Mayor of South RiverSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1935

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Al Walker, Inc. v. Borough of StanhopeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1957
  2. Automatic Merchandising Council v. Township of EdisonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1986
  3. Taxi's Inc. v. Borough of East RutherfordNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1977
  4. Anderson v. Mayor and Council of TownNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1949
  5. Nelson Cooney & Son, Inc. v. Township of South HarrisonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API