Legal Opinion

Levin v. City of Asbury Park

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided May 5, 1931PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pee Cueiam.

The writ is to review a conviction of the prosecutor in the recorder’s court, of violating an ordinance relating to itinerant venders, by doing business without a license. At the beginning of 1930 the license fee was $200 per month, and on March 13th Rose Levin, wife of the prosecutor, took out a license for a month and paid that fee. This was renewed on April 13th to expire May 5th, and a proportionate fee of $153.33 paid. On May 12th another license for a month, expiring June 12th, was issued, and a fee of $200 paid. On May 20th the ordinance was amended by raising the fee to…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Nelson Cooney & Son, Inc. v. Township of South HarrisonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1971
  2. Gurland v. Town of KearnySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1942
  3. Hoffman v. Mayor of South RiverSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1935
  4. Olan Mills, Inc. v. BD. OF COM'RS OF CITY OF TRENTONNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956
  5. Brackman v. KruseMontana Supreme Court · 1948

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API