Legal Opinion

Hamilton v. Missouri Petroleum Products Co.

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided March 10, 1969No. 53607PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STOCKARD, Commissioner.

In plaintiff’s action for personal injuries in which he sought damages in the amount of $65,000, the corporate and individual defendants filed separate counterclaims. The verdict of the jury was for defendants on plaintiff’s petition and for plaintiff on the two counterclaims. Judgment was entered accordingly and plaintiff has appealed.

The only contention on this appeal is that the trial court erred in admitting into evidence, over plaintiff’s objection, the testimony of Highway Patrolman Jim Gilmore in which he related the contents of statement made to him by defendant…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Allen v. St. Louis Public Service CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1956
  2. State Ex Rel. State Highway Commission v. KobernaSupreme Court of Missouri · 1965
  3. Sconce v. JonesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1938
  4. Kitchen v. WilsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1960
  5. Schears v. Missouri Pacific Railroad CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1962

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Bynote v. National Super Markets, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1995
  2. State v. SutherlandSupreme Court of Missouri · 1997
  3. Cantrell v. Superior Loan Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1980
  4. Kuzuf v. GebhardtSupreme Court of Missouri · 1980
  5. Walsh Ex Rel. Walsh v. Table Rock Asphalt Construction Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1975

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API