Legal Opinion

Federal Land Bank v. State Highway Department

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided March 14, 1934No. 13806PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. W. C. Cothran, Acting Associate Justice.

On August 20, 1930, the State Highway Department, desiring to acquire certain land for highway purposes on State Route No. 26, between Camden and the line of Sumter County, gave notice of condemnation to L. W. Boykin, as administrator of the estate of A. H. Boykin, deceased. The land sought to be acquired formerly belonged to A. H. Boy-kin and after his death became the property of his heirs at law. No notice of condemnation was given to the plaintiff herein, the Federal Land Bank, which held a mortgage up on…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Henderson v. City of GreenwoodSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1934
  2. State Ex Rel. Rawlinson v. AnselSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1907
  3. Gardner v. Blackwell, SEC. of StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1932
  4. Twin City Power Co. v. Savannah River Electric Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1930
  5. State ex rel. Snelling v. TurnerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1890

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. G. Curtis Martin Investment Trust v. ClaySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1980
  2. Chesterfield County v. State Highway Department of South CarolinaSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1936
  3. Lombard Iron Works & Supply Co. v. Town of AllendaleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1938
  4. Sumter County v. HurstSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1939
  5. G. Curtis Martin Investment Trust v. ClaySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API