Legal Opinion

G. Curtis Martin Investment Trust v. Clay

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided May 7, 1980No. 21222Published

1Opinion of the Court

274 S.C. 608 (1980)

266 S.E.2d 82

G. CURTIS MARTIN INVESTMENT TRUST and R. Gordon Darby, Respondents,

v.

Cecil D. CLAY, Henry E. Hollinshead, Clifton D. Green, Jr., Malcolm C. Hursey, Hiram C. Adams, James H. Lee, Sr., Charles M. Lanford, Mary N. Miller, and Alfred Williams, Constituting the Membership of the North Charleston Sewer District, Appellants.

21222

Supreme Court of South Carolina.

May 7, 1980.

David G. Jennings, Charleston, for appellants.

Lawrence E. Richter, Jr., Mount Pleasant, for respondents.

May 7, 1980.

HARWELL, Justice:

The appellants, Commissioners of the North Charleston Sewer…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Sammons v. CITY OF BEAUFORTSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1954
  2. Willis v. Town of WoodruffSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1942
  3. South Carolina Farm Bureau v. ScottSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1980
  4. State ex rel. Abbeville County v. McMillanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1898
  5. Atlantic Coast Line R. R. v. Railroad CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1911

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API