Legal Opinion

Leong Yau v. Carden

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided June 26, 1916No. 940PublishedCited by 21 opinions

Exceptions from Circuit Court, First Circuit. Hon. T. B. Stuart, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

ROBERTSON, C.J.

In an action for damages for malicious prosecution the circuit court overruled a demurrer to the plaintiff’s complaint and allowed an interlocutory bill of exceptions. It was alleged in the complaint that the defendant, at all times mentioned therein, was a deputy city and county attorney of the city and county of Honolulu, whose duty it was to investigate charges of crime, and, in proper cases, *363to prosecute the same; that on or about the 3rd day of December 1915, the defendant falsely and maliciously and without reasonable or probable- cause therefor,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Bradley v. FisherSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  2. Spalding v. VilasSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  3. Griffith v. SlinkardIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
  4. People v. SalsburyMichigan Supreme Court · 1903
  5. Pike v. MegounSupreme Court of Missouri · 1869

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Imbler v. PachtmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Yaselli v. GoffCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1926
  3. Cooper v. O'CONNORCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1938
  4. White v. TowersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Watts v. GerkingOregon Supreme Court · 1924

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API