Molton v. Woodruff
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtRussell, C. J.
(After stating the foregoing facts.) We concur in the judgment dismissing the petition upon the ground stated by the judge. lie held that the words “house and lot known as 290 Hillyer Ave. (on cor. Hillyer & Napier Ave.)” were entirely too vague and indefinite in any paper appertaining to a conveyance of real estate, or an interest in real estate. It will be noted that it does not appear where the house and lot known as 290 Hillyer Avenue is located. -It might be in Bibb County, and it might be in any one of the other 158 counties of this State. It might be in a foreign State, for all that…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Horton v. MurdenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
- Clark v. CagleSupreme Court of Georgia · 1914
- King v. BriceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1916
- Singleton v. CloseSupreme Court of Georgia · 1908
- Harriss v. HowardSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Blumberg v. NathanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1940
- Murphy v. MorseCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1957
- Cashin v. MarkwalterSupreme Court of Georgia · 1951
- Noland v. HaywoodWyoming Supreme Court · 1933
- Smith v. HelmsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.