Legal Opinion
Pactiv Corp. v. Multisorb Technologies, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided October 13, 2011No. Case No. 10 C 461Published
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
HARRY D. LEINENWEBER, District Judge.
Before the Court is Defendant Multisorb Technologies Inc.’s (“Multisorb”) Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on Count VI of Plaintiff Pactiv Corp.’s (“Pactiv”) First Amended Complaint, which alleges a breach of contract. For the reasons that follow, the motion is held in abeyance, and Pactiv is given 45 days to conduct additional discovery.
I. BACKGROUND
Pactiv and Multisorb are competitors in the field of modified atmosphere packaging for raw meat who are embroiled in a patent lawsuit in which each accuses the other of…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Kimberly Miller v. American Family Mutual Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
- Bethlehem Steel Co. v. Turner Construction Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1957
- Fannie B. Kalis v. Colgate-Palmolive Company, Millen True Value Hardware and Millen HardwareCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.