Legal Opinion
In Re: Marcum L.L.P.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided February 9, 2012No. 12-20054PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Per curiam
Petitioner Marcum L.L.P. (“Marcum”) has filed an Emergency Motion for Stay or Alternative Petition for Writ of Mandamus, which arises out of Marcum’s services as an expert in the trial of Allen Stanford, United States v. Stanford, 4:09-cr-342 (S.D. Tex.). Marcum agreed that it would be paid for its services as provided under the Criminal Justice Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3006A (“CJA”), which allows, inter alia, for the appointment of professionals to provide “investigative, expert, or other services necessary for adequate representation ....” § 3006A(e)(1). Under the CJA, payments to experts above…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Roche v. Evaporated Milk Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Gulfstream Aerospace Corp. v. Mayacamas Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Clinton v. GoldsmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- United States v. Ralph C. Stone, C. Michael Seibert, Attorney-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995
- United States v. Nicholas D'andrea, Jack Ware and Nelson HarrisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1980
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States v. Mark SnarrCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2013
- Marcum LLP v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
- Jarene Fletcher v. Court of Cr Appeals of TexasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2018
- Jessie Dotson v. State of TennesseeTennessee Supreme Court · 2023
- United States v. Mark SnarrCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2013