Capewell Horse Nail Co. v. Mooney
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern New York
In Equity. Suit to restrain alleged unlawful infringement of trademark and alleged unfair competition in trade.
1Opinion of the Court
RAY, District Judge.
The complainant, Capewell Horse Nail Company, is a Connecticut corporation, and has its factory and main and principal place of business at Hartford, in that state. The defendant, Walworth M. Mooney, is a citizen and resident of the state of New York, and has his factory and place of business at Ausable Chasm, in said state.
The parties are competitors in the business of manufacturing and selling horseshoe nails. The complainant company has been engaged in the business since 1881, and is one of the largest manufacturers and sellers of such nails in the United States. That…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- McLean v. FlemingSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Menendez v. HoltSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Canal Co. v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
- Columbia Mill Co. v. AlcornSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Lawrence Manufacturing Co. v. Tennessee Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1891
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- In re Morton-Norwich Products, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1982
- Samson Cordage Works v. Puritan Cordage MillsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1914
- Layton Pure Food Co. v. Church & Dwight Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1910
- Brunswick-Balke-Collender Co. v. American Bowling & Billiard Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
- United Lace & Braid Mfg. Co. v. Barthels Mfg. Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1915
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.