Legal Opinion

Transportes Aereos De Coahuila, S.A. v. Falcon

Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)

Decided September 20, 1999No. 04-99-00047-CVPublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Opinion by:

PHIL HARDBERGER, Chief Justice.

This is an accelerated appeal from a trial court’s order denying the special appearance filed by Transportes Aereos de Coa-huila, S.A. a/k/a TACSA (“TACSA”). TACSA contends that the trial court erred in denying TACSA’s special appearance based upon lack of personal jurisdiction. TACSA further asserts that it did not waive its special appearance based on the fifing of an agreed motion for, new trial to set aside a default judgment. We reverse the trial court’s order and render judgment dismissing TACSA.

Factual and PROCEDURAL History

On October…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Walker v. PackerTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Guardian Royal Exchange Assurance, Ltd. v. English China Clays, P.L.C.Texas Supreme Court · 1991
  5. CSR LTD. v. LinkTexas Supreme Court · 1996

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. BMC Software Belgium, NV v. MarchandTexas Supreme Court · 2002
  2. El Puerto De Liverpool, S.A. De C v. v. Servi Mundo Llantero S.A. De C.V., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2002
  3. Waterman Steamship Corp. v. Ruiz, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2011
  4. Case v. Grammar, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2000
  5. Joe Guerra Exxon Station v. Michelin Tyre Public Ltd., Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2000

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API