Legal Opinion
Consolidated Rail Corp. v. Surface Transportation Board
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided June 26, 2009No. 07-1401, 07-1529, 08-1019, 08-1052PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge HENDERSON.
“[Rjailway termini ... are our gates to the glorious and the unknown. Through them we pass out into adventure and sunshine, to them, alas! we return.” ■ — E.M. Forster, Howards End 16 (1921)
KAREN LECRAFT HENDERSON, Circuit Judge:
Consolidated Rail Corporation (Conrail) and 212 Marin, infra note 7, petition for review of an order of the Surface Transportation Board (STB or Board) concluding that Conrail must obtain authorization from the Board to abandon certain railroad trackage located in Jersey City, New Jersey. City of Jersey City…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Regional Rail Reorganization Act CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- BNSF Railway Co. v. Surface Transportation BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2006
- Consolidated Rail Corp. v. State of Ill.Special Court under the Regional Rail Reorganization Act · 1976
- Consolidated Rail Corp. v. Pittsburgh & LER Co.Special Court under the Regional Rail Reorganization Act · 1978
- CONSOL. RAIL CORP., ETC. v. Penn Central Corp.Special Court under the Regional Rail Reorganization Act · 1982
3Cited by29 opinions
- Riffin v. Consol. Rail Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2019
- City of Jersey City v. Consolidated Rail CorporationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- City of Jersey City v. Consolidated Rail CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2012
- City of Jersey City v. Consolidated Rail Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- 212 MARIN BOULEVARD, LLC VS. CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY (L-5801-09, HUDSON COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2019
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.