Legal Opinion
City of Jersey City v. Consolidated Rail Corp.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided September 28, 2010No. Civil Action No.: 09-1900PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Denying the Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment; Granting the Defendants’ Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment
RICARDO M. URBINA, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
The plaintiffs in this action are the municipality of Jersey City, New Jersey and two nonprofit organizations, the Rails to Trails Conservancy (“the RTC”) and the Pennsylvania Railroad Harismus Stem Embankment Preservation Coalition (“the Coalition”). The plaintiffs initiated this action against the Consolidated Rail Corporation (“Conrail”), which has purportedly sold a portion of abandoned rail property located in…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Village of Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Development Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Hunt v. Washington State Apple Advertising CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- O'Shea v. LittletonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- City of Jersey City v. Consolidated Rail CorporationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- City of Jersey City v. Consolidated Rail CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2012
- 212 MARIN BOULEVARD, LLC VS. CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY (L-5801-09, HUDSON COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2019