Legal Opinion

State v. Brant

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided July 7, 1982No. 21752PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ness, Justice:

Appellant Betty Brant was convicted of resisting arrest pursuant to § 16-9-320, S. C. Code of Laws, (1976). Brant asserts the indictment here was defective and that the arresting security guard was not a law enforcement officer within the meaning of the statute. We disagree and affirm.

Ronald Sturkie, a security guard, observed appellant shoplifting in the Richway Store where he was employed. Sturkie followed appellant out to the store’s parking lot where he arrested her for shoplifting. When placed under arrest, appellant and two of her relatives beat Mr. Sturkie in the head and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. CrenshawSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1980
  2. Southern Railway Co. v. South Carolina State Highway DepartmentSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1960
  3. State v. SweatSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1981

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Chiles v. CrooksDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1989
  2. City of Easley v. CarteeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1992
  3. In the Interest of Joseph B.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API