Schaffer v. Cloud
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Jones,
In principal part, this appeal calls for an application of “. . . the familiar rule that findings of fact by a chancellor, approved by the court in banc, have the force and effect of a verdict by a jury and will not be disturbed by an appellate court if supported by evidence of the quality required”: Christy v. Christy, 353 Pa. 476, 477-478, 46 A. 2d 169.
The plaintiff, a seventy-seven year old widower, filed his bill of complaint in this case in an effort to have the court below set aside his voluntary conveyance of his real property to a niece of his deceased…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Christy v. ChristySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
- Edirose Silk Manufacturing Co. v. First National Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
- Markovitz v. Markovitz Bros., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
- Baur v. AbbottSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
3Cited by3 opinions
- Roth v. HartlSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
- Schmoker v. SchmokerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
- Ziegenfuss v. Ziegenfuss Et Ux.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1946