Legal Opinion

Schaffer v. Cloud

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 7, 1947No. Appeal, 35PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Jones,

In principal part, this appeal calls for an application of “. . . the familiar rule that findings of fact by a chancellor, approved by the court in banc, have the force and effect of a verdict by a jury and will not be disturbed by an appellate court if supported by evidence of the quality required”: Christy v. Christy, 353 Pa. 476, 477-478, 46 A. 2d 169.

The plaintiff, a seventy-seven year old widower, filed his bill of complaint in this case in an effort to have the court below set aside his voluntary conveyance of his real property to a niece of his deceased…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Christy v. ChristySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
  2. Edirose Silk Manufacturing Co. v. First National Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  3. Markovitz v. Markovitz Bros., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  4. Baur v. AbbottSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Roth v. HartlSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
  2. Schmoker v. SchmokerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  3. Ziegenfuss v. Ziegenfuss Et Ux.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API