Legal Opinion

Markovitz v. Markovitz Bros., Inc.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 17, 1939No. Appeal, 115PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Me. Justice Baenes,

The hill of complaint was filed to require the officers of defendant to. restore certain entries upon the books of the corporation with respect to the stated valuation of its common stock, or in the alternative to pay to plaintiff, as executrix, the sum of $14,454.03, which she alleges is due the estate of her deceased husband, by reason of changes made in the original entries upon the books.

Complainant is the widow and executrix of Max Markovitz, who was an original shareholder of the corporation. This proceeding is one of a series of actions instituted by…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Belmont Laboratories, Inc. v. HeistSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  2. Pusey's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  3. Kratz v. AllentownSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  4. Feuerstein v. New Century Realty Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  5. Patterson's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ringer v. FinfrockSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  2. Norris Tool & MacHine Co. v. RosenlundSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
  3. Markovitz v. MarkovitzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  4. Markovitz v. MarkovitzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  5. Schaffer v. CloudSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API