Scheffield Medical Group, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
WOODS, J.
Introduction
Scheffield Medical Group, Inc., has petitioned for review of a Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board (Board) ruling that all medical reports dated later than January 16,1991, are inadmissible due to violations of Labor Code section 4628. We order the ruling affirmed. The request of Benjamin Y. Chong, M.D., to file an amicus curiae brief is denied.
Factual and Procedural Background
Medical-legal reports were generated by Pace, Scheffield and Charlton Medical Groups 2 in 107 cases consolidated for trial on one issue only— whether Maria Blanca Herrera was properly…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Moyer v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- Steven A. v. Rickie M.California Supreme Court · 1992
- LeVesque v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- Laurel Heights Improvement Ass'n of San Francisco, Inc. v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- Great Lakes Properties, Inc. v. City of El SegundoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Stevens v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
- Gangwish v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- Dina v. People ex rel. Department of TransportationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- American Rivers v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Stevens v. WCABCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.