Legal Opinion

Gangwish v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 22, 2001No. B145394PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KLEIN, P. J.

Introduction

Phillip Gangwish, injured while a firefighter/inspector for the City of Los Angeles Fire Department (City), petitions this court for increased compensation under Labor Code section 4650 for late payment of permanent disability (PD) benefits, and under section 5814 for nonpayment under section 4650. The Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) denied the increased compensation on grounds not raised before its decision issued, which Gangwish claims violated due process and is contrary to the record.

The City answers that increased compensation under section 4650…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Moyer v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  2. DuBois v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Kerley v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Gallamore v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Arriaga v. County of AlamedaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Booth v. BarnhartDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2002
  2. City of Long Beach v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
  3. Rea v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
  4. Jenkins v. AstrueDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2009
  5. City of Sebastopol v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API