Legal Opinion

Cook's v. Cook's Administrator

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided October 15, 1869PublishedCited by 11 opinions

This cause was argued upon the pleadings and proofs.

1Opinion of the Court

The Chancellor.

The bill in this case was filed by M. Hutchinson, executor of the will of Sarah Cook, deceased, for the direction of this court as to the estate of his testatrix in his hands. The ¡Seféndants are A. S. Jackson, the administrator of Charles Cook, deceased, who was the residuary legatee and devisee •in the will of Sarah Cook, and who survived her two days, and also the widow and infant children of Charles Cook.,

Sarah Cook, by her will, after sundry pecuniary legacies, gave all the residue of her estate, both real and personal, to her nephew, Charles Cook, his heirs and assigns…

2Cited by11 opinions

  1. Traverso v. TraversoNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1926
  2. Fidelity-Philadelphia Trust Co. v. HarloffNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1943
  3. Westfield Trust Co. v. BeekmanNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1925
  4. Camden Trust Co. v. HaldemanNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1943
  5. Skinner v. BoydNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1925

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API