Legal Opinion

Westfield Trust Co. v. Beekman

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided April 5, 1925PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

As to paragraph 5, it is argued that the trustees may never obtain a flattering offer for the "Social Register" from persons who will conduct it upon the same lines, and who can be relied on to maintain the standard established by the testator, or that such offer may not be obtained within a period of lives in being and twenty-one years thereafter, and that the trust is void as opposed to the rule against perpetuities, because the trustees are directed and charged with a positive obligation to conduct the "Social Register" unless and until offer of the kind described is obtained from persons…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. McGill v. Trust Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1923
  2. McGill v. Trust Co. of New JerseySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1924
  3. Aitken v. SharpNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1921
  4. Camden Safe Deposit & Trust Co. v. GuerinSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1918
  5. Trenton Trust & Safe Deposit Co. v. MooreNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1914

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Brown v. Fidelity Union Trust Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1939
  2. Fidelity-Philadelphia Trust Co. v. HarloffNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1943
  3. Ross v. PonemonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1970
  4. Fidelity Union Trust Co. v. RobertNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961
  5. National Newark v. Arthur, C., Blind BabiesNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1933

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API