United States v. Homer Lee Tucker
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
LEAVY, Circuit Judge:
In this case we are called upon to decide whether our supervisory power should be applied to reverse a criminal conviction on the ground that extreme delay in filing a trial transcript resulted in a denial of the appellant’s due process rights. We reject the government’s argument that there was no due process violation and therefore no ground for exercising our supervisory power, and reverse the conviction.
PRIOR PROCEEDINGS
On May 7, 1986, a federal grand jury handed down a ten-count indictment charging Homer Lee Tucker (“Tucker” or “appellant”) and Edwin Dale Houtchens…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. HastingSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Rheuark v. ShawCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
- Donald O. Coe v. Otis Thurman, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Jeffery AntoineCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- United States v. Richard MohawkCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- People v. Christopher S.California Court of Appeal · 1992
- United States v. Felipe Valencia ChavezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- United States v. Homer Lee TuckerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- United States v. Homer Lee TuckerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.