Legal Opinion

People v. Christopher S.

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 6, 1992No. H009733PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

PREMO, J.

Christopher S. appeals from an order declaring him a ward of the juvenile court under Welfare and Institutions Code section 602, based on the finding that he possessed lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD) for sale and committed an assault with a deadly weapon. Appellant argues that his due process rights were violated by the superior court clerk’s failure to send notice of his notice of appeal for nearly 16 months after the notice of appeal was filed. He further argues that the juvenile court committed reversible error by reading the probation report prior to the conclusion of the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Rheuark v. ShawCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
  3. Nino v. Gladys R.California Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Donald O. Coe v. Otis Thurman, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  5. United States v. Jeffery AntoineCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In re K.C. CA3California Court of Appeal · 2020
  2. In re Nicolas R. CA3California Court of Appeal · 2014
  3. In re R.M. CA1/2California Court of Appeal · 2020
  4. In re Y.G. CA3California Court of Appeal · 2020
  5. S.E. v. Superior Court CA4/2California Court of Appeal · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API