Legal Opinion

Donald O. Coe v. Otis Thurman, Warden

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided February 15, 1991No. 90-55128PublishedCited by 133 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DOROTHY W. NELSON, Circuit Judge:

Donald Coe, a California state prisoner, appeals the district court’s denial of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Coe claims that he has been denied due process of law by the failure of the California Court of Appeal to review his conviction in a timely and effective manner. He also claims that he has been denied effective assistance of counsel. We agree that the excessive delay in this case has violated his right to due process, and we therefore remand to the district court with instructions for it to enter an order directing the California Court of…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Evitts v. LuceySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Penry v. LynaughSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by133 opinions

  1. People v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
  2. United States v. MorenoCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2006
  3. People v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Harris v. ChampionCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
  5. Willie Clisby, Cross-Appellant v. Charlie Jones, Warden, Holman Unit, Alabama Department of Corrections, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1992

128 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API