Legal Opinion

United States v. Jay Sarno

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 7, 1979No. 76-1057PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BARNES, Senior Circuit Judge:

The issue on this appeal is whether defendant Jay Sarno (“Sarno”), who was acquitted of bribing agents of the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) by the trial judge following the jury’s inability to reach a verdict, is entitled, on the basis of double jeopardy and collateral estoppel, to the dismissal by the same trial judge of a subsequent perjury indictment which alleged that the defendant had testified falsely at the prior trial.

I. FACTS

Sarno was initially indicted along with Stanley Mallín (“Mallín”) and Leo Crutch-field (“Crutchfield”) 1 on charges of bribing a…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Ashe v. SwensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. United States v. Martin Linen Supply Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. United States v. SanfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. United States v. Richard A. HernandezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
  5. United States v. Curtis Keith GlasselCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. United States v. KramerCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1996
  2. Commonwealth v. HudeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  3. Commonwealth v. HolderSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  4. United States v. Buenaventura Castillo-BasaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  5. United States v. Terrance Alan EddyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API