Legal Opinion

Mapes v. Swezey

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 7, 1951PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHallinan, J.

Application, pursuant to article 78 of the Civil Practice Act, for an order declaring the petitioner to be a trustee of the Village of Patchogue and restraining respondent Mazzotti from exercising the powers of such office and for other related relief. Cross motion by some of the respondents for an order dismissing the petition for various reasons which will be hereinafter discussed.

A preliminary question of procedure has been raised by the petitioner’s moving to strike from the notice of cross motion exhibits and affidavits annexed thereto.

Section 1306 of the Civil Practice Act provides: “…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Condon v. Associated Hospital ServiceNew York Court of Appeals · 1942
  2. Greene v. . KnoxNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
  3. Schlobohm v. Municipal Housing AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1946
  4. Schlobohm v. Municipal Housing Authority for the YonkersNew York Court of Appeals · 1948
  5. Mazzotti v. SwezeyNew York Supreme Court · 1951

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Entwistle v. MurtaughNew York Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Kelly v. MonaghanNew York Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Sechrest v. Board of Education of Union Free School District No. 21New York Supreme Court · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API