Legal Opinion

Russell v. Mayor of Wilmington

Superior Court of Delaware

Decided July 29, 1932No. 96PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Rodney, J.,

delivering the opinion of the Court:

This case, for the first time in this state, calls for a construction of the act providing for a notice to municipal authorities of an accident or injury within a specified time from the happening of such injury.

At common law no such notice was necessary, but such statutes are quite common in other jurisdictions and are almost universally upheld.

The first contention of the plaintiff presents the question as to whether the giving of the notice is a condition precedent to the commencement or the maintenance of the action, or whether the failure to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Coyle v. GraySupreme Court of Delaware · 1884
  2. Mayor of Wilmington v. EwingSupreme Court of Delaware · 1899

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Royal Car Wash Co. v. Mayor and Council of W.Superior Court of Delaware · 1968
  2. Ridley v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  3. Ernestine Hirshfeld, of the Estate of Sam H. Hirshfeld v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1958
  4. Celanese Corp. of America v. Mayor of WilmingtonSuperior Court of Delaware · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API