Legal Opinion

Celanese Corp. of America v. Mayor of Wilmington

Superior Court of Delaware

Decided December 29, 1950No. 829 Civ. A. 1949PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Carey, J.:

Plaintiff contends that the notice requirement of Code Section 2470 does not apply to either count of the complaint; and that, if it does apply, the notices given meet the demands of the statute. The defendant takes issue with both of these contentions.

The defendant argues that, although the first count is based upon an alleged breach of contract, its true foundation is negligence in taking care of the goods, and that Section 2470 therefore applies. I do not agree. The case is typically one in which the plaintiff may sue either in contract or in tort. Keith Co. v. Booth Fisheries…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Federal United Corp. v. HavenderSupreme Court of Delaware · 1940
  2. Lewis v. Pawnee Bill's Wild West Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1907
  3. Doyle v. City of Coral GablesSupreme Court of Florida · 1947
  4. Marcy v. City of SyracuseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1921
  5. Powers v. Kansas City, Mo.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1929

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Vermeer Ex Rel. Vermeer v. SnellerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1971
  2. Royal Car Wash Co. v. Mayor and Council of W.Superior Court of Delaware · 1968
  3. Ernestine Hirshfeld, of the Estate of Sam H. Hirshfeld v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1958
  4. Hines v. New Castle CountySupreme Court of Delaware · 1994
  5. Royal Industries, Inc. v. Monogram Industries, Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1976

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API