Legal Opinion

Martin v. Union Pacific Railroad Company

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided September 30, 1970PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Connell, C.J.

This is an action to recover damages for property damage caused by a fire which originated on or near a railroad right of way and spread onto plaintiffs’ land. The action was commenced nearly four years after the damage occurred. The defendants demurred to the complaint on the ground that it disclosed on its face that the action was barred by the two-year statute of limitations, ORS 12.110 (1). ① The trial court sustained the demurrer and entered judgment for defendants. Plaintiffs appeal.

Plaintiffs’ eomplaint alleges that the defendants negligently caused the fire to occur and negligently…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. MARTIN ET UX v. Reynolds Metals Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Furrer v. Talent Irrigation DistrictOregon Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Watson v. Mississippi River Power Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1916
  4. Norwood v. Eastern Oregon Land Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Davis v. Georgia-Pacific CorporationOregon Supreme Court · 1968

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Hay v. Oregon Department of TransportationOregon Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Goodwin v. Kingsmen Plastering, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2016
  3. Elton v. Anheuser-Busch Beverage Group, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1996
  4. Lunda v. MatthewsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
  5. Koos v. RothOregon Supreme Court · 1982

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API