Legal Opinion

North Spokane Irrigation District No. 8 v. County of Spokane

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 25, 1976No. 43901PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrachtenbach, J.

This is an action brought by North Spokane Irrigation District No. 8 (hereafter District) seeking compensation, under the provisions of article 1, section 16 (amendment 9) of our state constitution, for the taking and/or damaging of its property. The taking and/or damaging consists of an interference by the County of Spokane (hereafter County) with a reservation to lay down and maintain water pipes and connections in the county road Market Street. The District appeals from the judgment of the Court of Appeals which affirmed the trial court’s order granting the County’s motion to dismiss for…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Great Northern Railway Co. v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1918
  2. State ex rel. Grinsfelder v. Spokane Street-Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Bradley v. Spokane & Inland Empire RailroadWashington Supreme Court · 1914
  4. City of Jacksonville v. Shaffer Et Ux.Supreme Court of Florida · 1932
  5. Gwin v. City of GreenwoodMississippi Supreme Court · 1928

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Sunset Lake Water Service District v. RemingtonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
  2. Maryland-National Capital Park & Planning Commission v. Town of Washington GroveCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2009
  3. City of Bisbee v. Arizona Water Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
  4. BEACHCROFT PROPERTIES v. City of AlabasterSupreme Court of Alabama · 2006
  5. City of Bisbee v. Arizona Water CompanyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API