DeHaven's Estate
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 5, May T., 1903, by H. E. Gilman, guardian of Frederick Albert De Haven, from decree of O. O. Daupbin Co., overruling exceptions to auditor’s report in estate of Jehu DeHaven. Exceptions to auditor’s report. The facts appear by the report of DeHaven’s report (No. 1), ante, p. 147. Error assigned was in overruling exceptions to auditor’s report.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Potter,
In the appeal of Jehu DeHaven taken from this decree, we have just filed an opinion in which we have expressed our view, that it was the.intention of the testator, Jehu DeHaven, Sr., to substitute Frederick Albert DeHaven in all the provisions of the will that would, have governed the legacy to Frederick H. DeHaven.
We see no reason for making any distinction between specific devises or bequests and those payable out of the residuary estate. The testator required that all moneys due and owing to him “ by each of said devisees and legatees shall, in the distribution…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Neff's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1865
- Coale v. SmithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1846
3Cited by8 opinions
- Hickman's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
- Knecht's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
- Morris's AccountSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
- Tyson's EstateSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1911
- Kerr's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1917
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.