Hickman's Estate
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Kephart,
The will of Nathaniel G-. Hickman with codicil attached was duly probated and no appeal taken therefrom, but, after various legacies had been paid, appellant, who is next of kin and a legatee, unsuccessfully endeavored to strike down the residuary bequest in the distribution of the balance of the estate. His contention was that there were a number of alterations and interlineations made by the testator after the execution of the will and codicil and that since they increased the amount of the residuary estate passing to charity that the bequest was void because…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Sebik's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
- Carson's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1913
- Miller's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1894
- Miller's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1895
- Stump v. FindlaySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1828
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Estate of WhitleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
- Way EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
- Norris's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
- Molden WillSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
- Sharar's EstateSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.