Legal Opinion

Hickman's Estate

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 3, 1932No. Appeal, 72PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Kephart,

The will of Nathaniel G-. Hickman with codicil attached was duly probated and no appeal taken therefrom, but, after various legacies had been paid, appellant, who is next of kin and a legatee, unsuccessfully endeavored to strike down the residuary bequest in the distribution of the balance of the estate. His contention was that there were a number of alterations and interlineations made by the testator after the execution of the will and codicil and that since they increased the amount of the residuary estate passing to charity that the bequest was void because…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Sebik's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  2. Carson's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1913
  3. Miller's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1894
  4. Miller's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1895
  5. Stump v. FindlaySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1828

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Estate of WhitleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  2. Way EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  3. Norris's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  4. Molden WillSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  5. Sharar's EstateSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API