Legal Opinion

Cecil v. Mix

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1855PublishedCited by 6 opinions

ERROR to the Tippecanoe Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtStuart, J.

Assumpsit on a promissory note averring, as to Mix, that he became one of the makers by signing his name on the back. The averment is, that on the day *479and year on which the note was made, at, &c., the defendant Mix signed his name in blank on the back, and that so signed the note was delivered to the payee, John P. Baker. Baker subsequently assigned to Cecil. Trial by the Court. Finding and judgment for the defendants. The evidence is all properly embodied in the record.

The evidence of John P. Baker, the payee, introduced as a witness for and released by Cecil, so far as it bears on this…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Wells v. JacksonIndiana Supreme Court · 1841

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Drake v. MarkleIndiana Supreme Court · 1863
  2. Rothschild v. GrixMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
  3. Snyder v. OatmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1861
  4. Pool v. AndersonIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  5. Rosenthal v. RamboIndiana Court of Appeals · 1902

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API