Legal Opinion
Russo v. Bache Halsey Stuart Shields, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided November 18, 1982No. 82 C 4219PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
ASPEN, District Judge:
Plaintiffs Sara Russo, David Russo and Mary Ann Parker have sued defendant Bache Halsey Stuart Shields, Inc. (“Bache”) for securities fraud under Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. § 783(b), 1 Rule 10(b)5, 17 C.F.R. § 240.10b-5, 2 several rules of the Chicago Board of Options Exchange, 3 Section 5(b) of the Securities Act of 1933, 15 U.S.C. § 77e(b)(2), 4 Regulation T of the Federal Reserve Board, 12 C.F.R. § 220.4(e)(2), 5 as well as various state law claims. Jurisdiction is asserted pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Cort v. AshSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- In Re Catanella and EF Hutton and Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1984
- Zola v. GordonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1988
- Dougherty v. MieczkowskiDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1987
- Hagstrom v. BreutmanDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1983
- Country Junction, Inc. v. Levi Strauss & Co. (In Re Country Junction, Inc.)District Court, W.D. Texas · 1984
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.