Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

United States v. Christopher

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided August 3, 1962No. 15,721Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partFerguson, Judge

(concurring in part and dissenting in part) :

I concur in part and dissent in pai't.

I agree that, under the particular circumstances of this case, the board of review did not abuse its discretion in choosing to reassess the sentence imposed by the court-martial rather than to order a rehearing on the sentence. Nevertheless, I entertain some substantial doubt concerning whether the problem before us really involves whether this Court — to which Congress had confided only jurisdiction over questions of law — has the authority to upset an honest determination by the board that a legally proper…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Jackson v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. United States v. LanfordUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1955
  3. United States v. VoorheesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1954
  4. United States v. VaraUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1958
  5. United States v. OakleyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1957

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API