Legal Opinion

State v. Clough

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided September 29, 1978PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GODFREY, Justice.

Like State v. Voisine, Me., 391 A.2d 1196 (1978), this case arose out of the payroll padding scheme in the Portland Public Works Department. The trial in this case was held two months after the trial of Voisine. With some exceptions, the evidence before the jury was similar to that described in the Voisine case. Like Voisine, appellants were indicted for conspiracy to commit the crime of cheating by false pretenses and for cheating by false pretenses under former 17 M.R.S.A. §§ 951 and 1601. Appellants were four of the six employees who were most often overpaid.

As in Voisine,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. BerubeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1972
  2. State v. KerrSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1918
  3. State v. VoisineSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1978

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. DodgeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1979
  2. State v. DiPietroSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1980
  3. State v. HoffstadtSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1995
  4. State v. DrakeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API