Legal Opinion

Brooks v. A.S.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided February 6, 2015No. 20120683PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Justice LEE,

opinion of the Court:

1 1 This case, like Nevares v. M.L.S., 2015 UT 34, 345 P.3d 719, presents questions concerning the applicability and constitutionality of Utah Code section 78B-6-111. That provision forbids a biological father from challenging an adoption when his child was conceived as a result of conduct that would constitute any sexual offense? described in the Utah Criminal Code. In this case and in Nevares, the statutory question presented is whether this provision can properly be construed to encompass sexual conduct in another state that would have been criminal if…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Morrison v. National Australia Bank Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 2010
  3. Manzanares v. ByingtonUtah Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Nevares v. M.L.S.Utah Supreme Court · 2015
  5. United States Bond & Finance Corp. v. National Building & Loan Ass'n of AmericaUtah Supreme Court · 1932

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Nevares v. M.L.S.Utah Supreme Court · 2015
  2. In re: J.M.S.Utah Supreme Court · 2015
  3. Nevares v. M.L.S.Utah Supreme Court · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API