Legal Opinion

United States ex rel. Cornitcher v. Myers

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided April 21, 1966No. Misc. No. 3229PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOSEPH S. LORD, III, District Judge.

Relator’s petition for habeas corpus alleges that he is presently confined pursuant to a conviction and sentence imposed by a Pennsylvania court for the crime of rape. He bases his petition on three grounds: (1) His conviction was procured by perjured testimony; (2) “The testimony of Betty Barlow, and Hattie Mincy as to abduction, was ignored by the Grand Jury; yet, the Commonwealth insisted that this was the means by which the alleged Rape was accomplished;” and (3) statements of a co-defendant implicating relator were improperly admitted in evidence. We…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Stirone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  3. Douglas v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. Mooney v. HolohanSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  5. Henry v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1965

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Lombardi v. PeaceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1966
  2. United States Ex Rel. Cornitcher v. RundleDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1968
  3. Joseph Marcy v. Superintendent Phoenix SCICourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2024
  4. United States ex rel. Cornitcher v. RundleDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1970
  5. United States ex rel. Mathis v. RundleDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1967

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API