United States ex rel. Cornitcher v. Myers
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
JOSEPH S. LORD, III, District Judge.
Relator’s petition for habeas corpus alleges that he is presently confined pursuant to a conviction and sentence imposed by a Pennsylvania court for the crime of rape. He bases his petition on three grounds: (1) His conviction was procured by perjured testimony; (2) “The testimony of Betty Barlow, and Hattie Mincy as to abduction, was ignored by the Grand Jury; yet, the Commonwealth insisted that this was the means by which the alleged Rape was accomplished;” and (3) statements of a co-defendant implicating relator were improperly admitted in evidence. We…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Stirone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Douglas v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Mooney v. HolohanSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Henry v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Lombardi v. PeaceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1966
- United States Ex Rel. Cornitcher v. RundleDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1968
- Joseph Marcy v. Superintendent Phoenix SCICourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2024
- United States ex rel. Cornitcher v. RundleDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1970
- United States ex rel. Mathis v. RundleDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1967
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.