Legal Opinion
United States v. Wynn Earl Westover, United States of America v. Bea Roberts
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 16, 1975No. 74-2279, 74-2262PublishedCited by 48 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RICH, Judge:
These two appeals have been consolidated for hearing and decision on the Government’s motion. Appellants Westover and Roberts were each convicted, after a jury trial, of conspiracy to smuggle and import merchandise 1 illegally, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371, and smuggling and illegal importation of merchandise, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 545. Both appellants received suspended sentences, the sentences to run concurrently, and were placed on probation. Inasmuch as appellants’ sentences are concurrent, we need sustain only one conviction of each appellant to affirm the judgment.…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Chambers v. MaroneySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Nye & Nissen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- United States v. MantonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1938
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- United States v. TurnerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- United States v. George H. Lustig, United States of America v. Gregory D. PedersonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- United States v. Frederick Ines Gordon, United States of America v. Edward LoeswickCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- United States v. J. Joseph Kennedy, United States of America v. Robert J. Myers, United States of America v. Lawrence F. CarlsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- United States v. Emslie Leander Moore, United States of America v. Floyd Moore, United States of America v. Pieter Cornelis PannekoekCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.