Legal Opinion
Podpeskar v. Makita U.S.A. Inc.
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided March 28, 2017No. Civil No. 15-3914 (JRT/KMM)PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ON MOTION TO DISMISS
JOHN R. TUNHEIM, Chief Judge
Plaintiff Sean Podpeskar brings this action based on alleged design defects in batteries manufactured by Defendant Makita U.S.A. Inc. (“Makita”). Podpeskar alleges the following claims: violation of the Minnesota Unlawful Trade Practices *1004Act (“UTPA”); violation of the Minnesota False Statements in Advertising Act (“FSAA”); breach of an express warranty and the implied warranty of merchantability and fitness; fraudulent misrepresentation, concealment, and failure to disclose; declaratory and injunctive relief; and…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Braden v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
- Bjc Health System v. Columbia Casualty Company, Atg Assurance Company Limited v. Columbia Casualty Company, Doing Business as Cna HealthproCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2007
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Ambassador Press, Inc. v. Durst Image Technology U.S.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2020
- Knotts v. Nissan N. Am., Inc.District Court, D. Maine · 2018
- In re Hardieplank Fiber Cement Siding Litig.District Court, D. Maine · 2018
- Ambassador Press, Inc. v. Durst Image Technology U.S.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2020
- Cleveland v. Whirlpool CorporationDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2021
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.