Legal Opinion

Cleveland v. Whirlpool Corporation

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided July 27, 2021No. 0:20-cv-01906Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Elisabeth Cleveland, on behalf of herself Case No. 20-cv-1906 (WMW/KMM) and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND v. DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS Whirlpool Corporation, Defendant. This matter is before the Court on Defendant’s motion to dismiss. (Dkt. 27.) For the reasons addressed below, Defendant’s motion is granted in part and denied in part. BACKGROUND Plaintiff Elisabeth Cleveland is a resident of Minnesota. Defendant Whirlpool Corporation (Whirlpool), a Delaware corporation with its…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. United Industries Corp. v. Clorox Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1998
  4. Wild v. RarigSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
  5. Blankenship v. USA Truck, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API