Legal Opinion
La Croix v. Donovan
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided May 5, 1922PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Per curiam
The facts, admitted or stipulated, are as follows: No appeal in writing was filed within ten days from the filing of the finding, which was on March 9th. Thereafter, on March 27th, counsel for defendant, by telephone, secured from Judge Haines, the trial judge, an extension of the time for filing the appeal, to 5 p. m. March 28th, and counsel, on said day, notified the clerk of the extension so granted. Judge Haines did not notify the clerk of the granting of this extension; nor did counsel for defendant notify plaintiffs, or their counsel, of his own intention to seek an extension of time…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Equitable Trust Co. v. PlumeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1918
- General Hospital Society v. New Haven Rendering Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1907
- Mercer Electric Manufacturing Co. v. Connecticut Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1914
- New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad v. IllySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1907
- Cramer v. ReebSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1915
3Cited by8 opinions
- Aubrey v. City of MeridenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1936
- Connecticut Mortgage & Title Guaranty Co. v. DiFrancescoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1930
- Delucia v. Home Owners' Loan CorporationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1944
- Ansonia Foundry Co. v. Bethlehem Steel Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1923
- MacDonald v. NewmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1931
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.