Legal Opinion

MacDonald v. Newman

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided January 27, 1931PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMaltbie, C. J.

It appears of record that on June 11th, 1930, the appellee recovered judgment against the appellant for $10,000 for personal injuries suffered by reason of the latter’s alleged negligence in the operation of a motor vehicle. On June 20th, 1930, the appellant moved for an extension of time in which to file a draft-finding for the period of ten days beyond the two weeks allowed by the statute for filing a request for a finding, alleging as cause that the court stenographer had been unable to furnish him with a transcript of the testimony, and on the next day this motion was granted. This…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Sparrow v. BromageSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1910
  2. Union Trust Co. v. Stamford Trust Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1899
  3. Mercer Electric Manufacturing Co. v. Connecticut Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1914
  4. Cramer v. ReebSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1915
  5. Burke v. WrightSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1903

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Palmer v. Des ReisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1949
  2. Delucia v. Home Owners' Loan CorporationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1944
  3. Raiken v. Montefiore Cemetery Assn., Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API