Legal Opinion

Phillips v. Findlay

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided March 21, 1973No. 2 CA-CIV 1285PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOWARD, Judge.

In this appeal the appellants claim that the trial court abused its discretion in granting the appellees’ motion to set aside the entry of default and default judgment. (Appellants were plaintiffs and appellees were defendants below.)

The facts pertaining to the entry of default and default judgment, viewed in the light favorable to the trial court’s decision are as follows.

On December 13, 1971, a complaint was filed by the plaintiffs in the Pinal County Superior Court alleging that they were injured by reason of the negligence of the following named defendants. Magma Copper…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bateman v. McDonaldArizona Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Camacho v. GardnerArizona Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Dowdy v. CalviArizona Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Thomas v. Goettl Bros. Metal Products, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Gray v. DillonArizona Supreme Court · 1964

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Daou v. HarrisArizona Supreme Court · 1984
  2. DeHoney v. HernandezArizona Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Beyerle Sand & Gravel, Inc. v. MartinezCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1977
  4. Mark Lighting Fixture Co. v. General Electric Supply Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1986
  5. Hawke v. BellCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1983

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API