Legal Opinion

Automated Collection Services, Inc. v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided August 9, 2017No. 17-765 CPublished

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING THE GOVERNMENT’S JULY 13, 2017 CROSS-MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD *

BRADEN, Judge.

On December 11, 2015, the United States Department of Education (“ED”) issued Solicitation No, ED-FSA-16-R-0009 (the “Solicitation”) to request proposals for the award of multiple Indefinite-Delivery, Indefinite-Quantity (“IDIQ”) contracts to collect defaulted student loans. AR Tab 1, at 1. Under the terms of the Solicitation, as amended, offerors were to be evaluated under three factors: “Past Performance” (Factor 1); “Management Approach” (Factor 2); and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Impresa Construzioni Geom. Domenico Garufi v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
  2. Honeywell, Inc. v. The United States v. Haz-Tad, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1989
  3. Savantage Financial Services, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
  4. Mantech Telecommunications & Information Systems Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2001
  5. MacAulay-brown, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API